Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research

نویسندگان

  • E. J. Rinia
  • H. G. van Vuren
چکیده

Ž . It is often argued that interdisciplinary research is valued less in both qualitative peer-review based as well as in Ž . quantitative bibliometric assessments. A recent extensive, nation-wide evaluation of all academic physics groups in the Netherlands allowed us to investigate this problem empirically. Therefore, we first developed an operationalization of ‘interdisciplinarity’. On the basis of our findings, we refute the above statement, at least for the field and the country Ž . Ž . involved. We found that i peer judgements do not significantly correlate with the degree of interdisciplinarity; ii only Ž . elementary bibliometric indicators correlate negatively, but iii ‘advanced’ indicators do not correlate with the degree of interdisciplinarity, except a small correlation in the case of large programs. Thus, we found no general evidence for a peer-review bias as well as a bibliometric bias against interdisciplinary research. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Bibliometric Evaluation vs. Informed Peer Review: Evidence from Italy

Bibliometric Evaluation vs. Informed Peer Review: Evidence from Italy A relevant question for the organization of large scale research assessments is whether bibliometric evaluation and informed peer review where reviewers know where the work was published, yield similar results. It would suggest, for instance, that less costly bibliometric evaluation might at least partly replace informed peer...

متن کامل

Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands

In this paper first results are presented of a study on the correlation between bibliometric indicators and the outcomes of peer judgements made by expert committees of physics in the Netherlands. As a first step to study these outcomes in more detail, we focus on the results of an evaluation of 56 research programmes in condensed matter physics in the Netherlands, a subfield which accounts for...

متن کامل

Scientometrics in a changing researchlandscape

Q uality assessments permeate the entire scientific enterprise, from funding applications to promotions, prizes and tenure. Their remit can encompass the scientific output of individual scientists, whole departments or institutes, or even entire countries. Peer review has traditionally been the major method used to determine the quality of scientific work, either to arbitrate if the work should...

متن کامل

University of Alberta Interdisciplinarity in Ecosystem Management by Anna

Global environmental deterioration demands the involvement of the academic community. Ecosystem management is a discipline within ecology that is especially concerned about doing interdisciplinary research in order to solve environmental problems. However, it is not clear what interdisciplinary work means, what its purpose is, and how it is practiced among ecosystem management researchers. The ...

متن کامل

Bibliometric Study of periodontal publications by Iranian authors between 1995-2015: A Medline approach

BACKGROUND AND AIM: One of the methods to measure scientific achievement in a particular field is bibliometric analysis of scientific publications. The main goals of this study were bibliometric analysis of Iranian periodontal literature, study design, and topics investigated in periodontal research published from 1995 to 2015 in PubMed.METHODS: PubMed search strategy was developed to identify ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001